Do beauty norms and practices subordinate women?Discuss in light of the work of One of the following authors: Susan Bordo, Sheila Jeffreys or Sandra Lee Bartky
A conversation surrounding the reasons why women engage in beauty norms and practices is noticeably absent. Nevertheless, those who do participate in this conversation, exhibit beauty practices either as the subordination of women or as empowering tools. I will present Sheila Jeffreys argument for the claim that beauty practices are harmful cultural practices, that they do subordinate women, specifically focusing on makeup. From this, I will display the choice rhetoric objection; beauty practices are empowering. I will defend Jeffreys argument by claiming that conceiving of make-up in merely positive terms miscomprehends the role makeup plays in womens lives, ignoring the deeper message that it subordinates women.
Sheila Jeffreys argues a condemnation of beauty norms and practices as a key source of womens subordination. She claims that western beauty practices such as makeup are harmful cultural practices that damage womens health, are performed for mens benefit and help create gender stereotyped roles that are justified through cultural tradition. (Jeffreys,2015,102)
Firstly, I will explain Jeffreys notion of sexual difference, which she maintains is perpetuated and endorsed by beauty practices, as they create as well as represent the difference between the sexes (Jeffreys,2015,7). She claims that our society is founded upon the notion of sexual difference (Jeffreys,2015,18) The beauty practices that have formed from this are fundamental in the classification of the sexes, as our culture requires that the sexual difference be publicly demonstrated. Consequently, this sexual difference is reinforced in these beauty practices in order for the dominant sex to be differentiated from the subordinate one (Jeffreys,2015,7) The patriarchy is sustained when someone is identified as a man or a woman, this difference is created in our culture, but is regarded as natural and biological. It is assumed that it is natural for women to be interested in beauty, that part of what it is to be a woman is to be beautiful in that they are eager to put in the time, money and pain to be beautiful (Jeffreys,2015,18) According to Jeffreys, this is what marks women out as obedient due to their willingness to do their service and to put effort into them when engaging in the practice (Jeffreys,2015,21) Thus, for Jeffreys, these practices dont just show women as different but rather as deferential. (Jeffreys,2015,21)
I am now going to demonstrate Jeffreys argument for the claim that beauty practices are harmful cultural practices (Jeffreys,2015,101) with a concentration on makeup. Makeup is worn by many women daily, however Jeffreys makes the important observation that there has been little to no examination on the reasons why women wear make-up (Jeffreys,2015,101) As a result she makes the analysis that, due to there being an absence of this research, this illustrates the societal shared assumption that these beauty practices are natural for women, so they are not viewed as deserving of an explanation for them. (Jeffreys,2015,101) Society has constructed the idea that women participate in wearing makeup because it is inherently a product of being female. Further, implying that because these practices are viewed as natural this entails that they are justified. (Jeffreys,2015,102)
Jeffreys notes of research on one area of the use of makeup and that is in the workplace, an area which is inherently male dominated. She uses Dellinger and Williams 1997 study to exemplify that wearing makeup is an expectation of women.
One finding was that the participants who usually wore makeup, found that when they went to work without it, they were questioned by others about their health. Makeup eliciting to a healthy appearance, illustrates that society works as if its possible to know a woman from her physical appearance, in particular her face. (Dellinger & Williams,1997,156) Additionally, the women felt that wearing makeup at work increased their perceived credibility, here makeup is being used as a method of judgement, demonstrating that women are being incorrectly evaluated. (Dellinger & Williams,1997,165)
Moreover, societys assumption that sexuality can be read from an individuals body arose from the study, that makeup works as a tool to mark them as heterosexual. (Jeffreys,108) One of the participants explained that wearing makeup made her job easier when working with her male counterparts as men tend to work easier with someone who is easy to look at (Jeffreys,2015,108) Highlighting that women should engage in beauty practices to serve mens sexual fantasies as it will make their lives easier (Jeffreys,2015,108). Thus, women are being required to conform to strict rules in how they should present themselves everyday such as in the workplace. (Jeffreys,2015,108)
This study reinforces the claim that beauty practices are created by men and are there for men to be sexually gratified. It is unattainable to avoid the objectifying male gaze. Thus, subordinating women. Jeffreys upholds this by claiming that women cannot be said to be freely choosing to participate in these practices in a society where men have the power to enforce their requirements (Jeffreys,2015,112)
However, with the emergence of the liberal focus on choice, the question arises; whether women are subordinated by these practices? This rhetoric of choice suggests that beauty practices dont subordinate women, because they exercise their free individual choice in whether to engage in the practices or not. Choice here, acts as a justificatory transformer. In this view, no further analysis of a womans actions or circumstances is needed if theyre understood to be as a outcome of her own choices. In the context of beauty practices, engagement in them is understood as an act of empowerment, theyre pleasurable devices of self-indulgence.
Despite this liberal rhetoric of choice, Jeffreys argues that it has assisted in normalising
disempowering beauty practices. Deeming it as a choice is self-deception. Heather Widdows acknowledges this paradox of choice, with the typical assertion used to justify engagement in these practices I chose this for me (Widdows,2018,5). The language here is regarded as acceptable for considering why we continue to insist that these practices are chosen and for ourselves even when we know they are required (Widdows,2018,5) Consequently, this concept of choice combined with women wearing makeup is only an imitation choice, directed by larger forces beyond her control, which Jeffreys argues that this liberal movement doesnt acknowledge. Jeffreys questions, that if for women putting on make-up has this feature of empowerment, then what renders being bare-faced disempowering? The answer lies in the restrictions that are imposed by external forces that stem from male dominance. Here, women are subordinated as they have anxiety about going out into the public world without makeup on, preventing them from living their everyday lives. (Jeffreys,2015,108)
This view that wearing makeup is a choice is undermined by the cosmetic industrys promotion of makeup to young girls. (Jeffreys,2015,111) A dominant feature of the beauty industrys marketing is creating this concept of sexual difference, which assumes women should be concerned about correcting their appearances. For example, this expectation begins at a young age with the marketing ploys that cosmetic companies use to make children consume their products (Jeffreys,2015,111) Makeup manufacturers target girls at such a young age for example, Toys R Us sell make-up kits labelled being suitable for children aged 5+. They also market their products by using popular characters from TV and films such as Barbie. As a consequence of young girls being exposed to make up at such a young age, first as a toy, as a form of play, where they know no different as havent had the chance to reflect. This will go on to produce the choices of their adult selves (Jeffreys,2015,111) Also this exposure, will help teach the appropriate gender roles and that make-up should be viewed as a form of self-fulfilment (Jeffreys,2015,111) As a result, this has assisted in normalising makeup as a harmful cultural practice. (Jeffreys,2015,111)
I will strengthen Jeffreys argument with the case of YouTube beauty culture. Beauty gurus sell the beauty norms and expectations online. Tutorials such as no makeup makeup illustrate societys paradoxical perception of natural beauty. This makes women feel that theyre confined, that they have an obligation to apply makeup but still appear that they arent wearing any. Additionally, it demeans those who dont engage in wearing makeup because it is not meeting the requirement of society to publicly demonstrate the sexual difference. Society has generated its own concept of natural, which doesnt contain a single flaw. The YouTube tutorials perpetuate this by conveying the message that women should cover up but also, they shouldnt allow the world to know that it isnt their real faces.
Lets suppose we apply this notion of choice, that the decision to wear makeup is genuinely an individual form of expression. If so, then there shouldnt be any social repercussions for someone who chooses not to wear makeup but as I display, there are. For instance, if we look at how the media portrays celebrities without makeup. This strengthens Jeffreys claim that beauty practices are seen as inherently female and thus natural for women. The media exposes female celebrities who choose not to wear makeup when performing everyday mundane tasks. Articles using words like shocking or spotted reinforces the societal constructed idea that makeup is natural for women. For example, Love Islands Ellie Brown is unrecognisable as she goes makeup free leaving the gym with boyfriend Charlie Brake (Daily Mail,2018) The word unrecognisable implies that we should be shocked by this. The fact that we are supposed to be shocked by this, results from us being so used to viewing makeup as an inherent part of women.
As a consequence of beauty norms and practices, women are presented with the impossible decision where either option perpetuates their subordination. Firstly, as a society we now claim that to wear makeup is the individuals choice. However, this supports a society which objectifies and discriminates against them, thus they are subordinated. Yet, as society we also humiliate others who choose not to engage in wearing makeup being caste as unattractive, so women remain subordinated. Widdows reinforces this with depicting conflict between non-engagement and engagement. We cannot accept the claims that engagement with these beauty practices are voluntary and chosen. The term choice, that they are proposing implies that you have the ability to engage or not to engage without suffering repercussions. However, as I have exemplified, the costs of repercussions in choosing not to engage are substantial. Widdows distinguishes between how women will receive external sanctions (being judged as ugly) and internal sanctions (feeling ashamed and disgusted) (Widdows,2018,2) What is going on both externally and internally subordinates women.
Alternatively, I acknowledge that Widdows may believe that she can rectify this issue of subordination with her mechanism of the imagined self. This is the idea that the reason why we engage in these beauty practices is because we are so invested in our imagined self. The imagined self is what we aspire to become, visualising ourselves to look in a certain way. It is unattainable. Yet, Widdows claims that then engaging in beauty practices such as makeup are then experienced as less demanding because we imagine our ideal selves (Widdows,2018,10) rather it is a positive and empowering experience which will be worth it in the end (Widdows,2018,10) However, I argue that re-framing beauty norms and practices positively by using this imagined self doesnt hold. It ignores where this imagined self will stem from, the beauty norm that has been created by patriarchy. For instance, women will likely conceive of their imagined self with flawless make-up, again suggesting that make-up is viewed as natural for women. This means that not only their actual self is subordinated but also their imagined self too.
Concluding, beauty practices, in particular makeup do subordinate women. I have exhibited this in virtue of Sheila Jeffreys claims, they are harmful cultural practices. Although, under the liberal notion of choice these practices are viewed as empowering, I have provided cases where this notion of choice is undermined, strengthening Jeffreys argument. Additionally, I have acknowledged Heather Widdows possible rectification of subordination, but argued that to reframe beauty practices positively ignores the greater message of subordination.
- Daily Mail (2018) Love Islands Ellie Brown is unrecognisable as she goes makeup free leaving the gym with boyfriend Charlie Brake
- Dellinger K & Williams C (1997)Makeup at Work: Negotiating Appearance Rules in the workplace,Gender and society, Vol 11 No 2 pg 157-165
- Jeffreys S (2015)Beauty and Misogyny: Harmful cultural practices in the West,Routledge, New York, Chapter 1 The grip of culture on the body pg 7-21, Chapter 6 Making up is hard to do pg 101-111
- Widdows H (2018)Perfect Me,Princeton University Press
- Note: Have used the unpublished chapters that were available on canvas due to not being able to access the book
- Chapter 8: I will be worth it!
- Chapter 9: Im doing it for me
Get Professional Assignment Help Cheaply
Are you busy and do not have time to handle your assignment? Are you scared that your paper will not make the grade? Do you have responsibilities that may hinder you from turning in your assignment on time? Are you tired and can barely handle your assignment? Are your grades inconsistent?
Whichever your reason is, it is valid! You can get professional academic help from our service at affordable rates. We have a team of professional academic writers who can handle all your assignments.
Why Choose Our Academic Writing Service?
- Plagiarism free papers
- Timely delivery
- Any deadline
- Skilled, Experienced Native English Writers
- Subject-relevant academic writer
- Adherence to paper instructions
- Ability to tackle bulk assignments
- Reasonable prices
- 24/7 Customer Support
- Get superb grades consistently
Online Academic Help With Different Subjects
Students barely have time to read. We got you! Have your literature essay or book review written without having the hassle of reading the book. You can get your literature paper custom-written for you by our literature specialists.
Do you struggle with finance? No need to torture yourself if finance is not your cup of tea. You can order your finance paper from our academic writing service and get 100% original work from competent finance experts.
While psychology may be an interesting subject, you may lack sufficient time to handle your assignments. Don’t despair; by using our academic writing service, you can be assured of perfect grades. Moreover, your grades will be consistent.
Engineering is quite a demanding subject. Students face a lot of pressure and barely have enough time to do what they love to do. Our academic writing service got you covered! Our engineering specialists follow the paper instructions and ensure timely delivery of the paper.
In the nursing course, you may have difficulties with literature reviews, annotated bibliographies, critical essays, and other assignments. Our nursing assignment writers will offer you professional nursing paper help at low prices.
Truth be told, sociology papers can be quite exhausting. Our academic writing service relieves you of fatigue, pressure, and stress. You can relax and have peace of mind as our academic writers handle your sociology assignment.
We take pride in having some of the best business writers in the industry. Our business writers have a lot of experience in the field. They are reliable, and you can be assured of a high-grade paper. They are able to handle business papers of any subject, length, deadline, and difficulty!
We boast of having some of the most experienced statistics experts in the industry. Our statistics experts have diverse skills, expertise, and knowledge to handle any kind of assignment. They have access to all kinds of software to get your assignment done.
Writing a law essay may prove to be an insurmountable obstacle, especially when you need to know the peculiarities of the legislative framework. Take advantage of our top-notch law specialists and get superb grades and 100% satisfaction.
What discipline/subjects do you deal in?
We have highlighted some of the most popular subjects we handle above. Those are just a tip of the iceberg. We deal in all academic disciplines since our writers are as diverse. They have been drawn from across all disciplines, and orders are assigned to those writers believed to be the best in the field. In a nutshell, there is no task we cannot handle; all you need to do is place your order with us. As long as your instructions are clear, just trust we shall deliver irrespective of the discipline.
Are your writers competent enough to handle my paper?
Our essay writers are graduates with bachelor's, masters, Ph.D., and doctorate degrees in various subjects. The minimum requirement to be an essay writer with our essay writing service is to have a college degree. All our academic writers have a minimum of two years of academic writing. We have a stringent recruitment process to ensure that we get only the most competent essay writers in the industry. We also ensure that the writers are handsomely compensated for their value. The majority of our writers are native English speakers. As such, the fluency of language and grammar is impeccable.
What if I don’t like the paper?
There is a very low likelihood that you won’t like the paper.
- When assigning your order, we match the paper’s discipline with the writer’s field/specialization. Since all our writers are graduates, we match the paper’s subject with the field the writer studied. For instance, if it’s a nursing paper, only a nursing graduate and writer will handle it. Furthermore, all our writers have academic writing experience and top-notch research skills.
- We have a quality assurance that reviews the paper before it gets to you. As such, we ensure that you get a paper that meets the required standard and will most definitely make the grade.
In the event that you don’t like your paper:
- The writer will revise the paper up to your pleasing. You have unlimited revisions. You simply need to highlight what specifically you don’t like about the paper, and the writer will make the amendments. The paper will be revised until you are satisfied. Revisions are free of charge
- We will have a different writer write the paper from scratch.
- Last resort, if the above does not work, we will refund your money.
Will the professor find out I didn’t write the paper myself?
Not at all. All papers are written from scratch. There is no way your tutor or instructor will realize that you did not write the paper yourself. In fact, we recommend using our assignment help services for consistent results.
What if the paper is plagiarized?
We check all papers for plagiarism before we submit them. We use powerful plagiarism checking software such as SafeAssign, LopesWrite, and Turnitin. We also upload the plagiarism report so that you can review it. We understand that plagiarism is academic suicide. We would not take the risk of submitting plagiarized work and jeopardize your academic journey. Furthermore, we do not sell or use prewritten papers, and each paper is written from scratch.
When will I get my paper?
You determine when you get the paper by setting the deadline when placing the order. All papers are delivered within the deadline. We are well aware that we operate in a time-sensitive industry. As such, we have laid out strategies to ensure that the client receives the paper on time and they never miss the deadline. We understand that papers that are submitted late have some points deducted. We do not want you to miss any points due to late submission. We work on beating deadlines by huge margins in order to ensure that you have ample time to review the paper before you submit it.
Will anyone find out that I used your services?
We have a privacy and confidentiality policy that guides our work. We NEVER share any customer information with third parties. Noone will ever know that you used our assignment help services. It’s only between you and us. We are bound by our policies to protect the customer’s identity and information. All your information, such as your names, phone number, email, order information, and so on, are protected. We have robust security systems that ensure that your data is protected. Hacking our systems is close to impossible, and it has never happened.
How our Assignment Help Service Works
1. Place an order
You fill all the paper instructions in the order form. Make sure you include all the helpful materials so that our academic writers can deliver the perfect paper. It will also help to eliminate unnecessary revisions.
2. Pay for the order
Proceed to pay for the paper so that it can be assigned to one of our expert academic writers. The paper subject is matched with the writer’s area of specialization.
3. Track the progress
You communicate with the writer and know about the progress of the paper. The client can ask the writer for drafts of the paper. The client can upload extra material and include additional instructions from the lecturer. Receive a paper.
4. Download the paper
The paper is sent to your email and uploaded to your personal account. You also get a plagiarism report attached to your paper.
PLACE THIS ORDER OR A SIMILAR ORDER WITH US TODAY AND GET A PERFECT SCORE!!!